首页> 外文期刊>Marriage & Family Review >Re-Examining Evelyn Hooker: Setting the Record Straight with Comments on Schumm's (201237. Schumm , W. R. ( 2012 ). Re-examining a landmark research study: A teaching editorial . Marriage and Family Review , 48 , 465 - 484 .[Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) Reanalysis
【24h】

Re-Examining Evelyn Hooker: Setting the Record Straight with Comments on Schumm's (201237. Schumm , W. R. ( 2012 ). Re-examining a landmark research study: A teaching editorial . Marriage and Family Review , 48 , 465 - 484 .[Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) Reanalysis

机译:重新审视伊夫琳·胡克(Evelyn Hooker):在Schumm(201237. Schumm,WR(2012)的评论中,创下纪录。重新审视具有里程碑意义的研究:教学社论。《婚姻与家庭评论》,48,465-484。[Taylor&弗朗西斯在线]查看所有参考文献)重新分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evelyn Hooker's research comparing the mental health of 30 male homosexuals to 30 male heterosexuals may be the most influential study in the history of social science. The American Psychological Association (APA) claims her work was the major reason it began advocating for acceptance of homosexuality. It led the American Psychiatric Association in 1973 to eliminate homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. And it impacted the U.S. Supreme Court's 2003 legalization of sodomy in Lawrence v Texas.Hooker reportedly believed experts would be unable to distinguish homosexuals from heterosexuals on psychological tests. Re-examination of her work indicates that Hooker's study was neither rigorous nor reliable. Among other problems, homosexual subjects were easily identified on test protocols; her reports of how she obtained her samples were incomplete and contradictory; and her study generated results supportive of obsession/compulsivity in homosexuals.Thus Hooker's study was seriously flawed. Moreover, because it was marketed by the APA as central in transforming homosexual activity from an illness/crime into acceptable behavior—yet Hooker did not correct those who mischaracterized her work—APA misrepresentations of Hooker over the past 40 years appear to be more in line with ideology than science.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSAmerican Psychological Association, Evelyn Hooker, homosexuality, mental health, misrepresentationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.700867
机译:伊夫琳·胡克(Evelyn Hooker)对30位男性同性恋者与30位男性异性恋者的心理健康进行比较的研究可能是社会科学史上最具影响力的研究。美国心理学会(APA)声称,她的工作是该组织开始倡导接受同性恋的主要原因。它导致美国精神病学协会于1973年从《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》中消除了同性恋。这影响了美国最高法院2003年在劳伦斯诉德克萨斯州对鸡奸的合法化。据报道,胡克认为专家在心理测试中无法区分同性恋和异性恋者。重新检查她的作品表明胡克的研究既不严格也不可靠。除其他问题外,根据试验方案很容易确定同性恋受试者。她关于如何获得样本的报告是不完整和矛盾的;她的研究产生了支持同性恋者强迫症的结果。因此,胡克的研究存在严重缺陷。而且,由于它是APA推销的,它是将同性恋活动从疾病/犯罪转变为可接受的行为的中心。但是,Hooker并未纠正那些误以其工作为特征的人。在过去40年中,APA对Hooker的虚假陈述似乎更多符合意识形态而非科学。查看全文下载全文关键字美国心理学会,伊夫林·胡克(Evelyn Hooker),同性恋,心理健康,虚假陈述相关变量add add_id linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布ID:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.700867

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:[email protected]

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号

OSZAR »